Where to begin? What a novel! Honestly, I am still reeling. Strange beyond strange. The weirdest aspect of it all – I still can’t decide whether I loved it or hated it. What I loved was the sheer boldness of the Devil. I also loved the imagery and the lightning fast roller coaster action. What I hated was always asking myself ‘what does that mean? and why did that just happen? Hard work.
I couldn’t even begin to sum up the plot, so I’ll just give you a few of the main points.
It begins with two men having a discussion while sitting on a park bench at Patriarch’s Ponds in Moscow. One is a poet called Bedzomy and the other is a man called Berlioz. He is the head of the literary society Massolit. They are having a discussion about the existence of Jesus Christ. A foreign looking gentleman sits down beside them. He goes by the name of Professor Woland, but is actually the devil – are you with me so far? OK that’s about the most straightforward part of the novel.
From there we have two settings, – 1930s Moscow, where Woland and his entourage, which includes an oversized cat called Behemouth, wreak havoc on society through magic shows, fires, and all manner of madness, which leads to many individuals ending up in a psychiatric ward, including the aforementioned Bedzomy.
The second setting is a novel within a novel – the Master, a writer that we only know by that name, has written a book about Pontius Pilate, and we are given extracts of this work which is set in Jerusalem. The Master also ends up in the psych ward, but is later freed. We know nothing about his past or where he came from, which I also found hard to get my head around.
If you want a detailed description of the novel, can I suggest you use Google, where you will find minds far better equipped to describe the plot than I can. I am merely blogging of my experience of reading this as part of my Reading Gym – she says, copping out entirely. Sorry but I feel I would need a Masters in English lit to get to the truth of this one.
So, I guess having ploughed my way through this novel, am I any the wiser?
Well one thing I can understand is why it is regarded as a classic. It includes magical realism, a satirical look at the Soviet Union of the 1930s, not to mention looking at the themes of religion and even love. There are also major thematic debates on the battle between good and evil.
The love story between the Master and Margarita only comes into play in the second half of the novel, and having persevered to that point, I began to enjoy it much more, as some of the mysteries were cleared up.
What I found difficult about this novel were the incredible number of themes, deeper meanings and satire. I found it hard at times to enjoy the story for its own sake. I was always aware of there being more than the narrative at play.
Would I recommend it? If you like a challenge, or you feel like reading something wild and completely different, then yes. Otherwise forget it. I feel like I would need to read it at least two more times to really get to grips with it, but somehow, I suspect I won’t ever read it again. Oh well, at least now I can say I have read some Russian literature!
If you have read it, please feel free to share your thoughts. Maybe you can educate us all?!
Next month’s read is Stoner by John Williams. Hoorah! I have read it before and cannot wait to read it again and share my views. I highly recommend Stoner.